Optimising cultural provision to improve older people’s wellbeing through social prescribing in the context of COVID-19: Realist review and evaluation
About the research project
In recent years, the cultural sector (which can include things like gardens and open spaces, galleries, museums, heritage sites, theatres and libraries) has supported public wellbeing (e.g. by providing a space for relaxation and distraction, volunteering
opportunities, or putting on activities for specific populations). Such provision can be considered as part of the ‘community assets’ (e.g. groups, organisations, charities, activities) that are central to social prescribing.
Social prescribing aims to empower people to address the ‘non-medical’ challenges (e.g. isolation, anxiety, low mood) that affect how they feel physically and psychologically. The NHS has seen the introduction of link workers who are employed to work
in GP practices to facilitate social prescribing. They do this by connecting people to community assets. This might include connections to cultural provision, which can reduce feelings of loneliness, help people think more clearly and give them something
to focus on away from their worries.
The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting what the cultural sector can offer, at a time when significant mental and/or social consequences of the crisis are anticipated (e.g. fear, low mood, money worries), especially among older people. From the outset this
population was identified as ‘at risk’ from the condition itself and responses to it (e.g. extreme loneliness).
This project will explore how the cultural sector adapts to support older people’s wellbeing. This will allow researchers to provide recommendations to the cultural sector about being 'referral-ready' (O’Neill, 2010) for social prescribing with older
people in the context of the current pandemic and future ones. The team is using a realist approach to explore what works, for whom, why and in what circumstances. This will involve developing a programme theory on how the cultural sector might
be best mobilised and engaged to support older people's resilience during and after the pandemic.
Research through a realist lens takes an explanatory rather than judgmental (works/does not work) focus when evaluating programmes and interventions. It does this by looking at how a programme or intervention changes context and activates generative mechanisms
to bring about specific outcomes. Realist approaches strive to develop an overarching programme theory, to “provide explanations of how and why intervention components work and how and why they may be optimally implemented” (Wong, 2015: p.1).
For the project, the team will produce a detailed insight into causal mechanisms - how resources offered through the cultural sector might influence older people and their reasoning and affect well-being. These mechanisms are likely to be shared across
settings but may be activated (or not) in different contexts. Specific components of the research, which will be conducted over 12 months, will be:
- Truncated realist review: To address objective 1, a realist review will permit us to use data from a range of documents (including surveys, qualitative papers and blogs) and settings to develop transferable learning.
- Stakeholder meeting: To address objective 2, we will conduct two online stakeholder meetings. This will enable us to present the programme theory developed from our realist review to a diverse audience, composed of participants from
across the globe who are part of GLAM’s Oxford Cultural Leaders Programme, and older people engaged with UK cultural provision.
- Testing and refining the programme theory: To address objective 3, we will collect primary data to extend and enhance the programme theory developed from the review. It will involve data collection with the following stakeholder groups:
- Older people: semi-structured interviews will provide an in-depth understanding of what might help or hinder older people from using the cultural sector for well-being;
- Link workers: survey to understand their views on the role of and interactions with staff from cultural institutions as part of social prescribing;
- Cultural institution staff: semi-structured interviews to understand how they are supporting older people’s well-being.
- Bringing data together to produce a refined programme theory: The final objectives will be addressed by bringing together data from different stakeholders to test the programme theory we developed from the review. This will allow
us to provide recommendations on what a ‘referrer ready’ cultural institution looks like in terms of social prescribing for older people in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To create a programme theory centred on optimising the use of the cultural sector for social prescribing for older people within the context of COVID-19;
- To develop dimensions of the programme theory with national and international stakeholders;
- To test and refine the programme theory in the real world by:
- Assessing what older people find helps or what hinders them from using the cultural sector for wellbeing, especially in the context of COVID-19;
- Evaluating what role link workers perceive for the cultural sector in terms of social prescribing in the context of COVID-19;
- Exploring challenges and potential solutions for cultural sector staff in providing social prescribing opportunities in the context of COVID-19.
- To understand how the cultural sector can build on, refine and adapt what it has offered previously to older people (pre COVID-19) to support their wellbeing, so that going forward they can work with and help a diverse range of individuals with specific
needs in the context of operating environments, new regulations and restrictions during the current pandemic and its subsequent recovery period.
- To develop recommendations that can be applied to practice within the cultural sector.
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC, AH/V008781/1)
Professor Kamal Mahtani, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Dr Stephanie Tierney, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Amadea Turk, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Jordan Gorenberg, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Dr Geoff Wong, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Lucy Shaw, Oxford University Gardens, Libraries and Museums (GLAM)
Dr Caroline Potter, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford
Dr Kathryn Eccles, Oxford Internet Institution, University of Oxford
Dr Kerryn Husk, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth
Professor Helen Chatterjee, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London
Project page on the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences website
O’Neill M. (2010) Cultural attendance and public mental health – from research to practice. Journal of Public Mental Health 9(4): 22-29.
Wong G. (2015) Special invited editorial: Getting started with realist research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14(5): 1-2.
Back to GLAM research projects and themes